I don't see it so much with the newer bodies, or with LR since they improved Fuji handling, and it's more of a pixel peeping thing - not something that I see in prints. Doing more Detail work isn't a big problem for me because I have already saved time in the Basic panel because the viewfinder is WYSIWYG and my exposure is often much closer to the final result than it is with a DSLR where I tend to be shooting more "correctly" (as in exposing to the right).Ī lot of the talk about a wormy look and advice about LR sharpening applies more to the earlier XTrans models like the XT1. I sense it's partly ISO-related, but also content (greens). I still don't feel I have nailed the settings, and I have 3 or 4 presets that I'll apply before I decide which way to go.
What I mean is that with Nikon I pretty well have a standard setting, essentially quite high sharpening and also high masking, but I don't really have such a standard with Fuji. But by comparison with NEFs in LR, I do feel the RAFs need more individual Detail panel settings. I get excellent results using an all LR workflow.īecause I wanted to see "the issue" for myself, I have experimented with the raw files in CaptureOne and Iridient X-Transformer (which produces demosaiced DNGs, so keep your raws) and I feel that in LR I can always match their results. I bought an XT2 a little over a year ago as a second camera, it was my first Fuji and first mirrorless, and it quickly became the camera I use most often. I don't think there is a consensus, Cletus, more like an assumption that there is a problem.
0 kommentar(er)
